Salt Marsh Growth · AI Discovery Audit — Live Demonstration
When Buyers Ask the AI, Who Gets Named?
We asked the AI engines real buyer questions about Beaufort real estate — for real, on 23 July 2026 — and recorded exactly who they named. This page shows the actual results, and what a firm can do about them.
A working sample of our AI Discovery Audit All results real · engine & date labeled
Why this matters now
58%
Google's share of combined search + AI discovery — down from 89% in 3 yrs
FirstPageSage 2026
25%+
of Google searches now show an AI Overview — cutting top-result clicks ~58%
Memeburn · Contently
14.2%
conversion rate of ChatGPT referral traffic vs ~2.8% from organic search
Stackmatix 2026
900M
weekly ChatGPT users — buyers now start research in AI conversations
Feb 2026
The panel — five real questions, real answers
A locally-tuned prompt panel, run live. Exact answers vary by session and user — that's why we sample and trend rather than promise. Here is who the engines actually named:
Buyer question
Engine
Who was named / cited
"Who are the best real estate agents in Beaufort, SC?"
Perplexity
Six individual agents named + The Faris Group ("400+ homes, $300M+, 5★"). Sources: US News agent rankings, agent sites, Zillow.
"What is the best real estate brokerage in Beaufort SC?"
Perplexity
The Faris Group, Chambers Helms Group (KW), Beaufort Realty Consultants, Collins Group Realty.
"I want to buy a house on Fripp Island — what should I know?"
Perplexity
Answer built from two firms' island guides — the firms that wrote the content got the citations. No agent recommendation given.
"What are the short-term rental rules in Beaufort SC?"
Perplexity
No local firm cited at all — the authoritative answer is unclaimed.
"Best real estate agents in Beaufort South Carolina"
Google
Local pack: The Faris Group 5.0★(73), a long-established Lady's Island firm 4.9★(46), BHHS Bay Street 5.0★(82). (No AI Overview rendered in our sample.)
World 1: Google's local pack
Still driven by Google Business Profile + reviews. Beaufort's established firms show up here — though we found real profile errors even among them (one 57-year-old firm's profile says "10+ years in business").
World 2: AI answers
Driven by content, citations, and rankings — a different winner's list. Several of Beaufort's longest-established names never appeared in any AI answer in our panel. Strong on Google ≠ visible in AI.
The local proof it works:
One Beaufort team appeared in every single answer — both worlds. Why? They publish citable, statistic-rich local guides and run a heavy review cadence. The engines quote what's quotable. What they did by instinct, an AI Discovery engagement does deliberately.
The open territory:
Topic questions — STR rules, island buying guides, insurance costs — are answered from whoever wrote the best page. In our panel, the STR-rules answer cited no local firm at all. The firm that publishes the authoritative Beaufort answers becomes the firm the AI quotes to every future buyer who asks.
The readiness audit — run on ourselves first
Before we audit anyone else, we ran the technical scorecard on our own site. Here's our honest before-state (23 Jul 2026) — these are the same checks we run for a client:
Check
saltmarshgrowth.ai (us)
Why it matters
AI crawlers allowed (robots / CDN)
No robots.txt at all
Engines can crawl — but nothing guides them. (Cloudflare users: AI bots now blocked by default.)
llms.txt
Missing
The "start here" file that tells language models what your business is.
Schema markup (entity data)
None
Machine-readable identity — who you are, where, what you do, your reviews.
Google Business Profile + Bing Places
Incomplete
≈32% of local ranking signals; ChatGPT leans on Bing's index — Bing matters again.
If we'll show you our own gaps, we'll be straight about yours. Every client audit reports exactly this honestly.
What we actually do about it
Access: verify every AI crawler can reach the site (robots.txt, CDN settings) — the silent killer we check first.
Entity: schema markup, llms.txt, clean structure — make the firm machine-readable.
Local trust: Google Business Profile + Bing Places completeness, review cadence with owner responses, consistent listings everywhere.
Citable content: the hyperlocal guides buyers actually ask about — written the way engines quote (stats, sources, plain answers).
Measurement: the prompt panel re-run quarterly — your share of AI answers vs named competitors, trended over time, with receipts.
Method & honesty: panel run 23 Jul 2026 on anonymous sessions (Perplexity; Google Search US). AI answers vary by user, session, and day — results are a labeled sample, not a census, and we report trends across repeated runs rather than single snapshots. Timeline expectations are set honestly (Perplexity responds in weeks; ChatGPT months; AI Overviews last). We measure and improve visibility; nobody can guarantee placement in AI answers — walk away from anyone who promises otherwise. Named results above are what the engines actually said; firms are named only where the engines named them publicly.